2022 – An Ideal Time to Review Plan Design
Each year, those in the retirement community collect, analyze and calculate data to ensure plan compliance with the laws that govern qualified retirement plans. The calendar of deadlines repeats each year, challenging plan sponsors and service providers to focus on the current plan compliance along with the myriad of changes that have come into effect in the last few years. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic created many financial difficulties and workplace changes for millions of employees and business owners. So, keeping abreast of the ‘normal’ routine of retirement planning, compliance has become anything but ‘normal.’
However, as we embrace our new work environment, there’s never been a better time for employers to reevaluate their current plan design. This is an opportunity to add or update features that align with changes to the company’s employee demographic and their business objectives and retirement plan goals, as well as take into account the effect of new regulations.
So, what’s happening in 2022? The Internal Revenue Service requires all qualified retirement plans to update their plan documents every six years. These updates are intended to reflect legislative and regulatory changes that occurred since the last restatement. For defined contribution plans, the most recent restatement cycle (called Cycle 3) opened on August 1, 2020 and will close on July 31, 2022. This is an important deadline because all plan documents, unless drafted in late 2020 or later, must be restated and adopted by employers by July 31, 2022. This restatement is mandatory and, if missed, plans will be considered out of compliance and employers may face IRS penalties.
The restatement period provides employers with an opportunity to enhance their existing retirement plans — especially if demographics, operations or hiring strategies at the company have changed. The timing of Cycle 3 means that recent changes, such as the hardship distribution regulations effective in January 2019, the SECURE Act of 2019, and the CARES Act of 2020, will need to be addressed in separate, good-faith amendments and will not be included in this restatement period. Cycle 3 restatements will, however, include language pertaining to regulatory changes enacted prior to February 1, 2017. These changes include:
- Expansion of the definition of “spouse” to include those of the same gender;
- Availability of plan forfeitures to offset additional types of company contributions;
- Ability to amend safe harbor 401(k) plans once the year has already started;
- Creation of in-plan Roth transfers.
Plan document restatement cycles give employers and service providers an opportunity to look at the retirement plan as a whole and evaluate the effects that law changes have on the effectiveness of the overall design and goals for the plan and its participants. For many employers and employees, COVID-19 had a detrimental impact on the ability to contribute to the plan. Additionally, many individuals found themselves withdrawing funds from their retirement savings, creating a downturn that will be challenging to recover from. So, a restatement, while mandatory, gives the employer an opportunity to implement solutions that can help individuals get back on track. Some plan design options to consider are listed below:
Eligibility: Eligibility defines how and when employees can join your retirement plan. Though your current eligibility requirements may fit the company’s employee demographic for full-time employees, the SECURE Act permits long term part-time employees (LTPTs) the ability to enter the plan starting in 2024, provided that they have satisfied the legally mandated requirements. Though SECURE Act law will not be included in this restatement, it seems wise to explore the effects that LTPT employees may have on your plan’s design and filing requirements.
Implement or expand auto-enrollment: Auto-enrollment enables employers to automatically enroll new hires into the retirement plan. Employees can always opt out of auto-enrollment if they decide they do not want to participate in the plan. Auto-enrollment has proven to be a successful tool in expanding retirement plan usage, especially among younger employees. According to a Principal Retirement Security Survey in July 2021, 84% of workers that were automatically enrolled in their workplace retirement plan say they started to save for retirement earlier than if they had to take action to make the enrollment decision on their own. To further help maximize savings and improve outcomes, employers may want to consider enrolling new employees at a higher deferral rate, such as 6%, rather than the standard 3%. The 6% rate will be far more meaningful for retirement and, though there is a risk that more participants could opt-out of the plan, a 2020 report released by John Hancock states the opposite to be true.
Under the SECURE Act, an eligible employer that adds an auto-enrollment feature to their plan can claim a tax credit of $500 per year for a three-year taxable period beginning with the first taxable year the employer includes the auto-enrollment feature.
Increase re-enrollment adoption: Re-enrollment has become increasingly important due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In a white paper for Voya Financial, Shlomo Benartzi, professor emeritus at UCLA Anderson School of Management, suggested frequently re-enrolling existing participants. He pointed to the U.K., where plan providers are required to automatically re-enroll workers every three years, even if they’ve previously opted out. Principal’s study group stated that they were glad their savings had been “jump-started” and reinforced that, if left to make the decision on their own, many wouldn’t have joined or would have at least delayed their enrollment.
Implement or expand auto-escalation: With auto-escalation, employees’ contributions are automatically increased every year. For example, employers can increase deferral rates by 1% each year up to a maximum of 15% of pay.
Redesign matching contributions. The pandemic has pressured many employers to discontinue or reduce their 401(k) contribution matches. Rebooting the matching contributions will go a long way in revitalizing employee interest in your plan. If the previous formula does not fit economically, employers might consider reducing the overall matching percentage but increase the cap on contributions (Example: 50% match up to 4% of pay changed to 25% up to 8%). This approach encourages the participant to defer a higher percentage of pay to receive the full matching contribution.
Dr. Benartzi suggested considering a fixed amount matching formula. From the participant’s perspective, a dollar amount seems more real than applying percentages to one’s paycheck. “Psychologically, it’s easy to give up a 6% match, but it’s hard to let go of a $1,200 lump sum,” he wrote.
The pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for employers that offer retirement plan benefits. With the future looking brighter and the Cycle 3 restatement deadline around the corner, now is the optimal time for business owners to review, and if necessary, update their plan design to align with the company’s goals and changing employee demographics.